237260

(2002) Synthese 133 (3).

Axiomatizations of hyperbolic geometry

a comparison based on language and quantifier type complexity

Victor Pambuccian

pp. 331-341

Hyperbolic geometry can be axiomatized using the notions of order andcongruence (as in Euclidean geometry) or using the notion of incidencealone (as in projective geometry). Although the incidence-based axiomatizationmay be considered simpler because it uses the single binary point-linerelation of incidence as a primitive notion, we show that it issyntactically more complex. The incidence-based formulation requires some axioms of the quantifier-type forallexistsforall, while the axiom system based on congruence and order can beformulated using only forallexists-axioms.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1023/A:1021294808742

Full citation:

Pambuccian, V. (2002). Axiomatizations of hyperbolic geometry: a comparison based on language and quantifier type complexity. Synthese 133 (3), pp. 331-341.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.