236447

(2008) Synthese 164 (2).

Exactness, inexactness, and the non-transitivity of perceptual indiscriminability

Charles Pelling

pp. 289-312

I defend, to a certain extent, the traditional view that perceptual indiscriminability is non-transitive. The argument proceeds by considering important recent work by Benj Hellie: Hellie argues that colour perception represents ‘inexactly’, and that this results in violations of the transitivity of colour indiscriminability. I show that Hellie’s argument remains inconclusive, since he does not demonstrate conclusively that colour perception really does represent inexactly. My own argument for the non-transitivity of perceptual indiscriminability uses inexactness instead as one horn of a dilemma: the key idea is that there is a class of perceptual experiences which might plausibly be supposed either to represent inexactly or to represent exactly—but which demonstrate the non-transitivity of perceptual indiscriminability either way.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9227-0

Full citation:

Pelling, C. (2008). Exactness, inexactness, and the non-transitivity of perceptual indiscriminability. Synthese 164 (2), pp. 289-312.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.