Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(2009) Synthese 171 (3).
In this paper I will argue that Crispin Wright’s defence of the claim that the truth about intention is judgement-dependent is unstable because it can serve also to establish that the truth about shape is judgement-dependent, thereby violating his constraint that in developing the distinction between judgement-independent and judgement-dependent subject matters we have to be driven by the assumption that colour and shape will fall on different sides of the divide.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9316-8
Full citation:
Miller, A. (2009). Primary qualities, secondary qualities and the truth about intention. Synthese 171 (3), pp. 433-442.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.