Repository | Book | Chapter
(1986) Thinking about society, Dordrecht, Springer.
Relativism is easily confused with tolerance and hence with rational scepticism. Absolutism is easily confused with sure conviction and hence with irrational fanaticism. But cognitive relativism, by denying absolute truth even as a regulative idea, evacuates the possibility of criticism, and hence the project of co-operative, progressive, learning from experience. All this is permitted by weak absolutism which is also able crisply to define the notions of relative truth and of toleration. Hence it is a better framework for the cognitive work of the anthropologist since it assimilates every community of knowers to the model of the community of science, be they primitive peoples or sophisticated anthropologists. Evans-Pritchard on the Azande, Turnbull on the Ik, and Gellner on Legitimation of Belief are discussed.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5424-3_4
Full citation:
Jarvie, I. C. (1986). Rationality and relativism, in Thinking about society, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 50-69.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.