Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="208469"
(2017) Wittgenstein on aesthetic understanding, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Language, for Wittgenstein, is anything but a stable and fixed set of names for things; the simple model of ostensive definition as the sole determinant of linguistic meaning does not survive the first section of Philosophical Investigations. Language, rather, is a myriad network of possible and actual actions that take place in particularized contexts, where the interconnecting relational linkages that emerge or reside within those contexts, those language-games, constitute in large part the meanings of our words and they constitute the preconditions for our verbal actions. This context-sensitivity applies to art and music as well as to language: art that we see or hear or read is in considerable part constituted by those relational interconnections. Thus the idea of a stable and fixed work of music or art, directly analogous to the model of the stable word given invariant meaning by direct reference or ostensive definition, is equally attractive to a mind seeking organized simplicity—and equally mythical.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40910-8_3
Full citation:
Hagberg, G. L. (2017)., Wittgenstein, music, and the philosophy of culture, in G. L. Hagberg (ed.), Wittgenstein on aesthetic understanding, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61-95.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.