Repository | Book | Chapter

194172

(1989) Freedom and rationality, Dordrecht, Springer.

Reflections on conceptual openness and conceptual tension

Leon J. Goldstein

pp. 87-110

Readers of a Festschrift honoring J.W.N. Watkins will surely know that once upon a time there raged a hotly-debated argument over whether the concepts used in the social sciences are individualistic or not. Having not long ago reread that debate as it was preserved by John O"Neill,1 I find myself thinking that the non-individualist papers are hardly the worse for wear, and that the individualist ones no more persuasive now than then. But I have had my say on all that in the terms in which I understood the debate and have no desire to repeat again what I said all those years ago. I would, however, like to indicate something about the nature of the problem from a perspective that was very far from my mind in those earlier years when the debate was taking place, that is, from a perspective that I have come to think of as conceptual tension.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2380-5_6

Full citation:

Goldstein, L. J. (1989)., Reflections on conceptual openness and conceptual tension, in F. D'agostino & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Freedom and rationality, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 87-110.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.