Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="179430"
(1986) Facts and values, Dordrecht, Springer.
Among the reasons that make one choose a scientific vocation those which arise from processes of moral reflection seem to play but a minor role. Indeed, it would be surprising if the curriculum vitae of a prominent scientist would indicate differently concerning his scientific career. Research is almost exclusively professional nowadays, and usually professions have a secure social and cultural status long before we decide to enter one. Doing so, therefore, does not normally presuppose self-justification at all. Normally there is no-occasion to ask questions such as whether the contemplated move is permissible or forbidden or, perhaps, especially commendable. Generally, moral conscience is no party to the choice of a scientific vocation; not because science places us beyond good and evil, but because the scientific occupation can be taken up and practiced in the shelter of traditionally self-evident assumptions.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4454-1_6
Full citation:
Lübbe, H. (1986)., Scientific practice and responsibility, in , Facts and values, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 81-95.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.