Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="178050"
(2018) Eva Picardi on language, analysis and history, Dordrecht, Springer.
Eva Picardi was a critic of both Chomskyan naturalism and Davidsonian semantic individualism. Though basically agreeing with her on both counts, I reject her identification of Chomsky's notion of "tacit knowledge" of language with Dummett's notion of implicit knowledge, and I argue that Eva's (and Dummett's) criticism of the latter notion does not apply to the former. In the second part of the paper, I take Eva's side in criticizing individualism, providing further reasons for the existence of a (normative) semantic standard and trying to explain what it is and why we are committed to it.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95777-7_15
Full citation:
Marconi, D. (2018)., Naturalizing Picardi, in A. Coliva, P. Leonardi & S. Moruzzi (eds.), Eva Picardi on language, analysis and history, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 319-335.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.