Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="177624"
(2002) History of philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer.
Neo-Kantian origins of modern empiricism
on the relation between Popper and the Vienna circle
Lothar Schäfer
pp. 43-55
Modern empiricism is usually thought to have emerged in opposition to the then dominant school of neo-Kantianism. True as this may be, it has blinded us to the fact that Kantian and more surprisingly even neo-Kantian elements of philosophy have also had a positive influence upon the development of the new empiricism. One episode in which this influence proves itself in fact dominant and which I will present in the following concerns the philosophical position which Popper adopted vis-à-vis logical empiricism — as advocated by Wittgenstein and Schlick — in Vienna in the late twenties and early thirties of the last century.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_4
Full citation:
Schäfer, L. (2002)., Neo-Kantian origins of modern empiricism: on the relation between Popper and the Vienna circle, in M. Heidelberger & F. Stadler (eds.), History of philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 43-55.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.