Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="194001"
(1981) Philosophie du langage, logique philosophique / Philosophy of language, philosophical logic, Dordrecht, Springer.
What form should a theory that specifies the meaning of all the sentences of a particular language take? I will follow the convention of calling such a theory for a particular language a ‘meaning theory’ (MT) for that language, and will reserve the phrase ‘theory of meaning’ for a theory (together with the arguments for it) about the correct form for a MT.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-8356-4_3
Full citation:
Peacocke, C. (1981)., The theory of meaning in analytical philosophy, in G. Fløistad & G. H. Von Wright (eds.), Philosophie du langage, logique philosophique / Philosophy of language, philosophical logic, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 35-56.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.