Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="193196"
(2010) The present situation in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer.
Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?
Daniel Andler
pp. 283-303
Jean-Paul Sartre famously wrote, nearly 50 years ago, that Marxism "remains the philosophy of our time. We cannot go beyond it." In his critic Raymond Aron's words, Marxism was for Sartre the "insurpassable [or, in other translations: unsuperable] philosophy of our time.1" Taken in context, Sartre's pronouncement was at once descriptive and prescriptive: it was, according to him, neither objectively possible for the philosopher to leave the confines of Marxism, nor ethically permissible to attempt to do so.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_21
Full citation:
Andler, D. (2010)., Is naturalism the unsurpassable philosophy for the sciences of man in the 21st century?, in F. Stadler (ed.), The present situation in the philosophy of science, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 283-303.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.