Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="191917"
(2013) Paraconsistency, Dordrecht, Springer.
Here, pluralism is introduced as a new and independent philosophy of mathematics in its own right. One of the marks of independence from more main-stream philosophical positions is that pluralists take seriously "bad" mathematics. Under "bad mathematics' I include: inconsistent theories, trivial theories, not yet completed theories and intensional theories. Bad mathematical theories are ignored by main-steam philosophers of mathematics because they take it as read that the philosopher's task is to give a philosophy of successful mathematics. In contrast, the pluralist contends that bad mathematical theories are as much a part of "mathematics' as are the successful parts. Moreover, they are philosophically important. Who is this pluralist? A pluralist in the philosophy of mathematics is someone who places pluralism as the chief virtue in her philosophy of mathematics. She brings the attitude to bear on: conflicting mathematical theories, including different foundations of mathematics, on different philosophies of mathematics and uses (what are usually dismissed as) "bad mathematical theories' to inform her philosophy.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_15
Full citation:
Friend, M. (2013)., Pluralism and "bad" mathematical theories: challenging our prejudices, in K. Tanaka, F. Berto, E. D. Mares & F. Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 277-307.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.