Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="187853"
(1974) Kant's theory of knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer.
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant repeatedly characterized the thing in itself (Ding an sich or noumenon) in such terms as "the non-sensible cause" of representations or as "the purely intelligible cause" of appearances (A 494 = B 522). Again and again he employs the language of causal efficacy with regard to things in themselves. Thus he speaks of "the representations through which they [things in themselves] affect us' (A 190 = B 235) and elsewhere says that things in themselves are in principle unknowable: "they can never be known by us except as they affect us' (Foundations of the Metaphysic of Morals, Ak. 452) because the thing itself is a "transcendental object, which is the cause of appearance and therefore not itself appearance" (A 288 = B 344). The thing in itself is described as "the true correlate of sensibility which is not known, and cannot be known" through its representations (A 30 =B 45).
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2294-1_18
Full citation:
Rescher, N. (1974)., Noumenal causality, in L. White Beck (ed.), Kant's theory of knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 175-183.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.