Repository | Book | Chapter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7421f/7421f1b41b5b75ac661837c68f5c2d9f2082a48a" alt="176768"
(2002) Hermeneutic philosophy of science, van Gogh's eyes, and God, Dordrecht, Springer.
I am intrigued and greatly impressed by Patrick Heelan's analyses of van Gogh's "Bedroom at Arles" (1888: Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, de la Faille 482).1 Heelan has surely unearthed a most important finding. The questions that occurred to me in reading his account arose in the spirit of wanting a fuller statement of his analysis of pictorial perspective. The paramount issue for me was this: Is the analysis meant to provide a correct "reading" of this particular painting (possibly, of others very much like it, the Chicago Art Institute's version for instance); or is it meant to sketch a paradigm of "task-oriented" (phenomenological) space, hence normative constraints drawn from the lived-world that govern (or should guide) its "correct" pictorial representation?
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1767-0_19
Full citation:
Margolis, J. (2002)., Patrick Heelan's interpretation of Van Gogh's "bedroom at arles", in B. Babich (ed.), Hermeneutic philosophy of science, van Gogh's eyes, and God, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 233-238.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.